Gov. Jerry Brown has signed into law California's tax on Internet sales through affiliate advertising which will immediately cut small-business website revenue 20% to 30%, experts say.
The bill, AB 28X, takes effect immediately. The state Board of Equalization says the tax will raise $200 million a year, but critics claim it will raise nothing because online retailers will end their affiliate programs rather than collect the tax.
Amazon has already emailed its termination of its affiliate advertising program with 25,000 websites. The letter says, in part:
(Full disclosure: I have a personal website that has been an Amazon affiliate. It made $2 last quarter. That is not 30% of my income.)
Almost all the California Amazon affiliates have fewer than 75 employees and a large percentage have no employees, according to Rebecca Madigan executive director of the Performance Marketing Association, a Camarillo-based nationwide trade association.
"This law won't impact Amazon that much but it is a crisis for website owners who make revenue by placing ads on their websites for thousands of online retailers," Madigan said. "Most of them don't have a physical presence in California."
California Retailers Association stated: "We thank Governor Jerry Brown and the leaders in the California State Legislature who have demonstrated their leadership and commitment to California businesses by passing and signing e-fairness into law. Small and large businesses across the state have been held at a major disadvantage by the current law that out-of-state online companies like Amazon.com and Overstock.com have exploited for years. This has cost us jobs and revenues."
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1992 ruled that states cannot tax businesses that aren't physically within their boundaries. Such taxes would regulate interstate commerce, which is a federal government prerogative.
However, New York in 2008 passed a law to require companies with online affiliate advertising programs to collect sales tax for sales through those affiliates based in New York. Since then Rhode Island, North Carolina, Illinois, Arkansas and Connecticut passed similar laws.
Amazon is suing New York over the law, and the Performance Marketing Association is suing Illinois.
Amazon affiliate Keith Posehn, owner of zorz.com in San Diego, said he had affiliate advertising agreements with more than 70 companies and these programs were 35% of his company revenue before the California legislature passed a similar bill last year. Then-Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed that bill.
"We got 70 termination letters in one night before he vetoed it," Posehn said. After that, he started changing his business away from affiliate advertising and has started a new mobile application company.
"I have pitched investors and several question the wisdom of staying in California," Posehn said. "Some venture capitalists are very keen on placing startups outside California because start-up costs are less."
However, another Amazon affiliate, Glenn Richards, an independent recording artist in Orange County (MightyFleissRadio.com), is angry with Amazon and its head Jeff Bezos.
"I think that Amazon.com's decision to throw their affiliates, (including myself) under the bus is a national disgrace," Richards said. "Jeff Bezos should be ashamed of his conduct. His bully boy practice and tactics of extinguishing small business in California should be (condemned). Small business has no power...and no hope to confront Internet giants like Amazon.com."
Board of Equalization Member George Runner blasted Brown for signing the law. "Even as Governor Jerry Brown lifted his pen to sign this legislation, thousands of affiliates across California were losing their jobs. The so-called 'Amazon tax' is truly a lose-lose proposition for California. Not only won’t we see the promised revenues, we’ll actually lose income tax revenue as affiliates move to other states."
The bill, AB 28X, takes effect immediately. The state Board of Equalization says the tax will raise $200 million a year, but critics claim it will raise nothing because online retailers will end their affiliate programs rather than collect the tax.
ADVERTISEMENT
(The bill) specifically imposes the collection of taxes from consumers on sales by online retailers - including but not limited to those referred by California-based marketing affiliates like you - even if those retailers have no physical presence in the state.
We oppose this bill because it is unconstitutional and counterproductive. It is supported by big-box retailers, most of which are based outside California, that seek to harm the affiliate advertising programs of their competitors. Similar legislation in other states has led to job and income losses, and little, if any, new tax revenue. We deeply regret that we must take this action.
The new law won't affect customers, Amazon said, but added that the immediate termination of the affiliate program also applies to endless.com, myhabit.com and smallparts.com.(Full disclosure: I have a personal website that has been an Amazon affiliate. It made $2 last quarter. That is not 30% of my income.)
Almost all the California Amazon affiliates have fewer than 75 employees and a large percentage have no employees, according to Rebecca Madigan executive director of the Performance Marketing Association, a Camarillo-based nationwide trade association.
"This law won't impact Amazon that much but it is a crisis for website owners who make revenue by placing ads on their websites for thousands of online retailers," Madigan said. "Most of them don't have a physical presence in California."
California Retailers Association stated: "We thank Governor Jerry Brown and the leaders in the California State Legislature who have demonstrated their leadership and commitment to California businesses by passing and signing e-fairness into law. Small and large businesses across the state have been held at a major disadvantage by the current law that out-of-state online companies like Amazon.com and Overstock.com have exploited for years. This has cost us jobs and revenues."
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1992 ruled that states cannot tax businesses that aren't physically within their boundaries. Such taxes would regulate interstate commerce, which is a federal government prerogative.
However, New York in 2008 passed a law to require companies with online affiliate advertising programs to collect sales tax for sales through those affiliates based in New York. Since then Rhode Island, North Carolina, Illinois, Arkansas and Connecticut passed similar laws.
Amazon is suing New York over the law, and the Performance Marketing Association is suing Illinois.
Amazon affiliate Keith Posehn, owner of zorz.com in San Diego, said he had affiliate advertising agreements with more than 70 companies and these programs were 35% of his company revenue before the California legislature passed a similar bill last year. Then-Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed that bill.
"We got 70 termination letters in one night before he vetoed it," Posehn said. After that, he started changing his business away from affiliate advertising and has started a new mobile application company.
"I have pitched investors and several question the wisdom of staying in California," Posehn said. "Some venture capitalists are very keen on placing startups outside California because start-up costs are less."
However, another Amazon affiliate, Glenn Richards, an independent recording artist in Orange County (MightyFleissRadio.com), is angry with Amazon and its head Jeff Bezos.
"I think that Amazon.com's decision to throw their affiliates, (including myself) under the bus is a national disgrace," Richards said. "Jeff Bezos should be ashamed of his conduct. His bully boy practice and tactics of extinguishing small business in California should be (condemned). Small business has no power...and no hope to confront Internet giants like Amazon.com."
Board of Equalization Member George Runner blasted Brown for signing the law. "Even as Governor Jerry Brown lifted his pen to sign this legislation, thousands of affiliates across California were losing their jobs. The so-called 'Amazon tax' is truly a lose-lose proposition for California. Not only won’t we see the promised revenues, we’ll actually lose income tax revenue as affiliates move to other states."
50 comments
Sort:
Score: 1
Name withheld
linucity
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore linucity. Show Details
That should not be a new law.
Living in California and doing online transactions, we charge customers that are locally in California?
Why AMAZON should be different? because they are so big?
Aviv
http://www.linucity.com/
Living in California and doing online transactions, we charge customers that are locally in California?
Why AMAZON should be different? because they are so big?
Aviv
http://www.linucity.com/
Score: 0
Name withheld
ericincm
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore ericincm. Show Details
Well, that should drive those nasty business owners with their "corporate jets" out of this satet for good!
Go Mr Brurns!
Go Mr Brurns!
Score: 2
Name withheld
goofball42
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore goofball42. Show Details
Well, if there is something the California Legislature can do to turn California into another bastion of unemployed, over taxed, illiterate, mindless fools like Oregon, then they are very successful indeed. Way to go!
What Can Brown Do To You Today!
What Can Brown Do To You Today!
Score: 1
Name withheld
harleyxx
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore harleyxx. Show Details
I would formally like to invite Amazon to relocate to Sunny Florida.
Screw California! This is just the first lobby in the assault on Internet businesses. It will get much worse.
Screw California! This is just the first lobby in the assault on Internet businesses. It will get much worse.
Score: 2
Name withheld
junkmann
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore junkmann. Show Details
California...
TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX
It doesn't matter if the people can eat, because the STATE MUST FEED.
TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX
It doesn't matter if the people can eat, because the STATE MUST FEED.
Score: 0
Name withheld
biorep1
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore biorep1. Show Details
Congrates Amazon for standing up to your rational principles. My prediction....many business will now go out of business due to moonbeams hair brained plan. Tax revenues will now go down and the demoncrats will sit there scratching their heads saying Duh,,,,wha happened? They will then want to raise taxes again on something else that will destroy jobs
Score: 2
Name withheld
paddyflan
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore paddyflan. Show Details
The democrats from CA to the White House will never ever change their out-of-control tax and spend ideals because it underpins the whole premise of a democrat.......POWER......if you can enslave the population through welfare you can near enough get re-elected by all the dependents you have created. When a democrat talks about spending cuts, I don't believe a word of it. Unfortunately, I fear that the only way to destroy these idiots will be at the hand of our creditors who sooner or later will cut us off.
Score: 1
Name withheld
oregonresident
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore oregonresident. Show Details
How about a house in Oregon. 3000 sf
no sales tax.
no sales tax.
Score: 1
Name withheld
bigdoglv
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore bigdoglv. Show Details
As an out of state consumer, I will look for the lowest overall price. With the tax added, products will not be coming from CA. Jobs will be lost there, but jobs will be added where I buy my products. People with jobs add more revenue than those who do not work. Pretty easy huh? Why can't they figure that out.
Score: 2
Name withheld
faygoo
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore faygoo. Show Details
thank you mr brown now in unable to feed my family. i love my state, i hate my gov!
No comments:
Post a Comment