The System works because you work!

The System works because you work!

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER
All told, governments killed more than 262 million people in the 20th century outside of wars, according to University of Hawaii political science professor R.J. Rummel. Just to give perspective on this incredible murder by government, if all these bodies were laid head to toe, with the average height being 5', then they would circle the earth ten times. Also, this democide murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century. Finally, given popular estimates of the dead in a major nuclear war, this total democide is as though such a war did occur, but with its dead spread over a century

Popular Posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Q&A: Japan's nuclear crisis



Q&A: Japan's nuclear crisis

By Thair Shaikh, CNN
March 30, 2011 -- Updated 0731 GMT (1531 HKT)
Part of the Fukushima power station photographed on March 23 -- radiation still appears to be leaking from the damaged plant.
Part of the Fukushima power station photographed on March 23 -- radiation still appears to be leaking from the damaged plant.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Radioactive water found for first time outside one of the reactor buildings
  • Plutonium has been detected in soil samples near the plant
  • Contaminated sea water detected near plant
  • Likely partial meltdown in three reactors say experts
(CNN) -- Despite the heroic efforts of technicians and engineers battling to prevent a full nuclear meltdown at the quake-damaged Fukushima Daiichi plant, radioactive material is still seeping into the surroundings of the power station.
Plutonium has been detected in soil samples near the plant, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) said Monday.
And highly radioactive water has been found for the first time outside one of the reactor buildings on Monday, albeit in a tunnel. Radioactive iodine and cesium have also been detected in sea water near the plant, Japan's nuclear and industrial safety agency said last week.
These latest reports of radioactive leaks -- and the possibility that there may have been a partial meltdown in three reactors -- raise questions about the immediate dangers poised to human health and the environment.
Austere conditions for Fukushima workers
Radioactivity 100,000 times normal
Setback at nuclear plant?
NGOs critical of Japan's quake response
How did radioactive water leak out of reactor No. 2?
It is still not entirely clear how radioactive water made its way into a maintenance tunnel leading to reactor No. 2's turbine building.
However, Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano says he has received a report that the No. 2 unit's containment vessel "is damaged and water is leaking."
Professor Robin Grimes, Director of the Center for Nuclear Engineering at Imperial College London, says it is possible that some contaminated water could also have leaked from the "external steam suppression unit," which may have been damaged during a hydrogen explosion in the building surrounding the reactor on March 14.
"This is a guess, it has to be emphasized, " says Grimes, "There is a complex cacophony of different sources that could have contributed to the leaking water."
What about the contaminated seawater?
Meanwhile, tests revealed radioactive iodine at more than 3,000 times the normal level in ocean water near the plant -- a new high, Japan's nuclear safety agency said Wednesday.
The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said monitoring data collected Tuesday afternoon detected the I-131 isotope at 3,355 times the normal level.
The sample was taken 330 meters (1,080 feet) away from one of the plant's water discharge points, the agency said. Radiation readings from seawater outside the plant have fluctuated. They spiked Sunday, then dropped a day later. Officials did not pinpoint a particular cause for the higher readings.
Journalist Martin Savidge, who is reporting on the incident for CNN from Tokyo, says one theory is that the tunnel may have contributed: "The fact that water has been detected in the tunnels could explain how it (contaminated water) has got into the ocean."
However, Japan's nuclear safety agency says there's no evidence yet of overflow. It said workers are using sandbags and concrete panels to keep the water inside the tunnel, which is located about 55 meters (180 feet) from the shore. The radioactive iodine and cesium could have also been in the atmosphere and then been washed down by precipitation.
And the radioactive soil?
Plutonium was detected in soil on the grounds of the nuclear power plant. The element was found in soil samples taken March 21-22 from five locations around the plant, says Tepco.
More woes in Japan nuclear crisis
Japan's human toll
A new view of the tsunami's attack
Living near a nuclear plant
RELATED TOPICS
The No. 3 reactor has been of particular concern because it is the only one to use mixed-oxide fuel that contains a small percentage of plutonium, which is also a byproduct in other reactors.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told reporters Tuesday that it was "likely" at least some of the plutonium came from the plant.
Grimes said it is not clear where the plutonium in the soil had come from, also adding that it is possible that it was from the Fukushima plant.
"These are incredibly small amounts at the moment but we need to keep watching," says Grimes.
What is radiation?
In the context of nuclear energy it is ionizing radiation that is referred to, which passes through matter causing it to become electrically charged or ionized. In living tissues, the electrical ions produced by radiation can affect normal biological processes.
Are these leaks dangerous?
"The sea is a phenomenally large dilution vehicle so when you get radioactive material in the ocean most of it just gets diluted. Some of the radioactive particles could collect in material near the reactor and this will have to be monitored and cleaned," says Grimes.
"If it got into local sea life, such as shell fish which tend to concentrate this type of material, then there will be repercussions and there might have to be restrictions on the consumption of local fish."
According to the plant's owners, the plutonium in the soil poses no human health risk.
What are the effects on humans?
Malcolm Grimston, Associate Fellow for Energy, Environment and Development at London's Chatham House, said the single biggest issue following the Chernobyl disaster was radioactive iodine getting into the thyroid gland and causing cancer.
What is happening to the water being used to cool the reactors?
Water has been a key weapon in the battle to stave off a meltdown at the facility but officials say there is a flip side to pumping and spraying tons of water to keep radioactive fuel from overheating: the water has to go somewhere.
"Now the focus is how to... remove the water and contain it safely," Edano told reporters Tuesday.
Savidge says: "They have to keep the water flowing to keep the reactors cool, but some of it has been leaking into access tunnels, the basement... and the containment sites, where the water is stored, are all full. They are simply trying to stop the water from going into the sea using sandbags to block drainage pipes."
What is a partial meltdown?
Japanese officials and international experts have said they believe there has been a partial meltdown at three of the six reactors at Fukushima.
"A full meltdown occurs when the core reactor melts and ends up in a pool at the bottom of the vessel. A partial meltdown occurs when some of the fuel rods have been damaged and some of the fuel comes out. Some of the leaking radiation could have come from a partial meltdown," says Grimes.
Will the plant be nationalised?
Talks are continuing about the government becoming a majority shareholder, says Savidge. The government is worried about the ability of the plant owners to fulfil any future compensation claims. The government thinks that the owners could struggle with such claims, adds Savidge.
How did the crisis at the plant begin?
Three reactors were in operation when the 9.0 magnitude quake struck on March 11. The reactors -- which went into service between 1970 and 1979 -- are designed to shut down automatically when a quake strikes, and emergency diesel generators began the task of pumping water around the reactors to cool them down. However, these stopped about an hour later. The failure of the back-up generators has been blamed on tsunami flooding by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
CNN's Paul Armstrong contributed to this report.
Log in or sign up to comment
soundoff (41 Comments)
Show: Newest | Oldest | Most liked

Post a comment

Log in or sign up to comment
  • Raphael2947
    There is only one logical conclusion here:
    1) TEPCO decided the Pacific Ocean is a good place to drain the salt water from the overheated plants
    2) TEPCO decided that the MOX fuel with plutonium would also be drained into the ocean
    3) The media is lying to us because they are listening to official sources 
    4) They will probably continue draining the radioactive waste into the ocean since they have decided they have no containers to dump it in.
    5) They have decided to declare that dumping cesium and other radioactive elements poses no danger to seafood
    6) don't eat Alaskan crabs anymore unless you want to glow in the dark less
  • Safer 
    HEY CNN,,How about asking....WHAT IS BEING DONE TO REPAIR THE PLANT. Where are your reporters? Libya?
    Or, ask professor Grimes who is in London and has nothing to do with the situation to do more "guessing" Now "that's" reporting.
  • RHSimard
    There's plenty of reporting on what's being done, in the news and on the websites of such agencies as IAEA and others. We all would like more information, but there is only so much to be had. The most we could hope for is greater technical detail about what's being reported already, and I'd much r... more
  • FromIowa9
    More informaton is essential. And, providing more information about the disaster and the nuclear industry does not mean the on-site workers will have to 'stand around'. There remain many basic questions that have not been answered - at the top of the list (1) what are the current hazards for additional radiation release, and (2) when can we expect to see this fixed? There are also fundamental questions about the activities of the US nuclear industry, and on energy policy more generally. less
  • daphnerp
    Okay...for some reason everyone seems to minimizing the potential health effects on people (also have to think about animals and vegetation as well). Thyroid cancer...I have had thyroid cancer due to living close to the above ground nuclear testing in the 1950s. My whole entire side of my mother's family (her mother, father, two brothers, and herself) have had cancer and all but one brother has died of the disease. They were in Hirosima after the war. So, please stop minimizing the health effects of radiation. And as far as it getting into the soil and water...that is not good...no matter how much. less
  • 1wolfgang 
    Atomic energy has reared its ugly head and the consequences are grim. As this beast spews out its poisonous rath on man and the sea, we are perplexed in how to 'kill' it. Its half life is far longer than ours. God help us for we know not what we do.
  • ffmills
    Arrogant, haughty, high-handed, lordly, imperious, cavalier, cheeky, cocky, conceited, domineering, egotistic, high and mighty, know-it-all, pompous, presumptuous, pretentious, proud, puffed up, self-important, smug supercilious, superior, swaggering, 
    ... All words to describe people who think they can build safe nuclear power plants.
    less
  • jscottii
    From doing some research a bit ago on the pass nuclear disasters I discovered a few things. First let me say this. It seems like we are moving too far forward and dismissing what we need to do now to help the problem.

    Here are the ideas that from research, my heart, and god willing I recommend.
    1)Liquid nitrogen (not my idea but from a source on the internet done in the pass. Wish I could remember the source.)
    2)They put up concrete barriers to contain the radiation.(also from history.)
    3)Although it sounds different is there a possible vacuum cleaner that could be used or made. Maybe using some kind of expandable material as a bag.

    To conclude it sure is commendable how the Japanese handled these terrible disasters and to the brave men that are giving their lives for there country. As to the brave men that give there lives and fight for our country as well and humans a whole. It is also great to see the unified effort of all the countries contributing not for what they will receive as a reward but because that is the right thing to do. God bless you. less
  • RHSimard 
    Why do so many people assume that somehow the government, or even just a lot more people, could magically solve this problem?
  • blackjackz
    Liquid nitrogen, if i remember correctly, US offer them a handful of those since Day 1, but they reject the offer.

    Concrete, they said the reactors are too hot that the concert would crack (dunno if htat is true).

    The Japanese shows the world their great attitude during disaster time, but their government (in my opinion) is doing a bad job. less
  • FromIowa9
    There are excellent resources available to governments and the international community. The armed services and civilian agencies of Japan and the international community have enormous resources and skilled people --especially the U.S. Navy, which has very highly skilled nuclear engineers and many other resources that can and should be mobilized asap. This remains a major corss-border threat after all this time. We must act and fix this thing without further minimization of the problem and delay. less
  • awesomo95
    there is nothing bad about nuclear power, great source of energy, no greenhouse gas emissions. Wait until after the incident at Fukushima has cleared and you will see that the only bad thing was a minor radiation leak, and that the reactors are now unusable and will be replaced by a coal burning plant that will kill thousands of people. Fukushima has yet to result in 1 death, and might at most cause 5 cases of cancer. less
  • damian79 
    what are you talking about!?? "Wait until after the incident at Fukushima has cleared and you will see that the only bad thing was a minor radiation leak"... you monger iiidiot, stuupid people like you are the ones that operate these coorporations.
  • damian79 
    Fukushima has yet to result in 1 death,?? there has been 5 deads from the 50 people group... and will cause more deaths and disaster for the Nature.. I would like to hit you right in your face...
  • Bixbyte 
    MORE DANGEROUS THAN CHERNOBYL. The contamination is not by radioactive Iodine. 
    Beta Rays from radioactive Iodine that cause Thyroid Cancer. AT JAPAN, The Danger is gamma bombardment and Exposure by Plutonium. Death.
  • arara
    Please watch following YouTube videos - the reality of Japanese nuclear workers.This is documentary TV program based on the interview by photographer Kenji Higuchi. Now I understand why Japanese nuclear workers got irradiated in the polluted water without adequate gears in Fukushima nukes. Japanese ... more
  • VIRALSURVIVO
    The System is in decline. Our way will not continue. We are doomed to survive the test to come.Another civilization reaches its slow autumn. It will take decades, generations, centuriesto build something new again.Chaos is the new order. We are losing what has been made before us. Our monuments, mar... more
  • thecomedian 
    hmmmm, I wonder if they're LYING!!!!!!!!!!.......again
  • kinderlove
    If, in the U.S., a nuclear power plant goes kaboom and you have to flee your home, then on top of all of the other problems you'll have, here are two more:1. Your homeowner's insurance will not reimburse you. This is because of the Price Anderson Act, which limits the liability of nuclear power pla... more
  • FromIowa9
    I would hope that any accident that is a result of deilberate misconduct -- such as fraud or falsifying safety reports -- would not trigger the liability limitation. Otherwise, the Price-Anderson act becomes a free license to pollute and to harm people on a massive scale, and removes an important i... more
  • rbrtw
    Mankind will ever face the risk of nuclear meltdown, radioactive leaks, if insisting continuously in using nuclear fission power plant as source of energy. I believe a better option is investing in nuclear fusion instead of nuclear fission. Aneutronic fusion is to be the most dense and environmental... more
  • RHSimard
    Nuclear fusion would definitely be a superb advancement in energy technology. It's just been so damned elusive so far. The question is, what to do in the meantime? So far, when the pluses and minuses of the various energy-generation technologies available are added up, nuclear (fission) power has... more
  • VIRALSURVIVO
    The System is in decline. Our way will not continue. We are doomed to survive the test to come.Another civilization reaches its slow autumn. It will take decades, generations, centuriesto build something new again.Chaos is the new order. We are losing what has been made before us. Our monuments, mar... more
  • RealValues
    One point though : That plutonium in the soil poses no human heallth risk.You have to be a crackaddict hillbilly 15 buds a day to believe that. Anyone that believes so just think abut it twice : The most dangerous substance to humans (plutonium) in the soil poses no human health risk.Huh? In the soi... more
  • celh 
    Yes, lets first worry about how the owners of the plant are going to pay off all the damages~!..
    Good grief..How about helping to fix this ASAP? Put some money and man power into that.

No comments: