The System works because you work!

The System works because you work!

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER

DEATH BY GOVERNMENT: GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER
All told, governments killed more than 262 million people in the 20th century outside of wars, according to University of Hawaii political science professor R.J. Rummel. Just to give perspective on this incredible murder by government, if all these bodies were laid head to toe, with the average height being 5', then they would circle the earth ten times. Also, this democide murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century. Finally, given popular estimates of the dead in a major nuclear war, this total democide is as though such a war did occur, but with its dead spread over a century

Popular Posts

Saturday, April 16, 2011

YOUR RINGSIDE SEAT FOR THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS

Seeds of Their Own Destruction

by John Rubino on April 11, 2011
All those new dollars being created by an apparently-still-panicked Fed are pushing up asset prices across the board (with housing the only exception) and pushing the dollar down to near-record lows versus other currencies. The charts look eerily like a replay of 2007, which, of course, is exactly what policymakers want. Rising asset prices, according to the prevailing logic, will get us spending and borrowing again and return the economy to self-sustaining expansion. 2006 and 2007, for the people running this show, were the good old days.
What they seem to be missing is that these trends contain the seeds of their own destruction, just as they did four years ago. Oil, for instance, is back above $100 a barrel, which translates into $4 a gallon gas, which amounts to a sizable tax increase on the consumers who are supposed to start spending again. CNBC just reported that gas sales have fallen for five straight weeks.


Same thing for food. Ag commodity prices are through the roof, which is gradually translating into higher prices at grocery stores and restaurants. Consumers, as a result, will be eating out a lot less in the year ahead — and will still have fewer dollars to spend on other things.

In the financial markets, precious metals are blowing away old records…

For policymakers, gold and silver occupy a kind of shadow world. They’re not “real” money like dollars and euros, but for some inexplicable reason people still respect them. Central bankers worry that they’re being unreasonably blamed for their inability to keep their currencies stable versus these atavistic lumps of metal. As masters of their universe, they don’t like being contradicted by the rabble in the marketplace. And as managers of fictitious currencies they’re terrified of an “emperor’s new clothes” scenario in which everyone suddenly sees the con they’re running. So they’re watching gold in particular with rising anxiety.
…and the dollar is approaching the low it hit just before the world fell apart in 2008.

This too is a desired goal of US policy, because it makes US exports more attractive for the rest of the world. But of course it also makes imports more expensive, which raises the question of how much lower the dollar can go before headline writers put currency depreciation and rising food/energy prices together. A series of New York Times articles speculating about the end of dollar hegemony (and explaining the nature of money) is the Fed’s nightmare because it will get people to thinking about what exactly a paper currency is. Once that train leaves the station its inevitable destination is the conclusion that a fiat currency isn’t really anything. It’s just a consensual hallucination founded on our trust for the people managing it. Which in turn leads newly-awakened citizens to check out those YouTube videos of Bernanke and Greenspan getting pretty much everything wrong, documentaries like Inside Job, and the ongoing hearings of Ron Paul’s subcommittee, in which Fed and Treasury officials are revealed to be mumbling incompetents and frauds.
As an understanding of the scam spreads, consumers and investors rush to convert their dollars into other currencies and hard assets and the game is over. A crisis of confidence sends the dollar into free-fall.
This of course is to be avoided at all costs, which makes the dollar’s recent decline versus food, energy, and other currencies such a dilemma. It can’t keep falling indefinitely, so if it doesn’t stabilize on its own — i.e., if gold, oil and food don’t stop going up — action will have to be taken to stop it. With Europe and China now raising interest rates, how long will it be before the Fed is forced to follow suit and start sucking liquidity out of the system? And how long after that before everything that’s been going up in concert starts to fall together?
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
{ 26 comments… read them below or add one }
Schnookums April 11, 2011 at 9:31 pm
If I were Ben (which Wall Street is undoubtedly happy I’m not) and looking at these charts, the only logical conclusion that I would come to is to implement QEIII and plan for QEIV and hope it doesn’t blow sky-freaking-high until I’m either retired or dead. What else would I do? I’m not an ambassador for the American people after all. I do what I’m told…….
Brad Thrasher April 11, 2011 at 10:31 pm
Part two of the plan is that US exports will save the dollar. Looks great on paper except that about all we export is food and paper money/debt now. The dollar must collapse to the point whereby US based manufacturing is competitive again. The trick is of course to maintain debt service in ever declining dollars while at the same time increasing the debt ceiling. Obviously, in terms of timing the event (dollarcollapse) the current fiscal policy debate and the market reaction is key to the short term. We’ve lost a rather important customer in the Japanese. Is the current austerity program, which amounts to cutting social welfare in favor of expanding corporate welfare, selling in Beijing, Bonn and the BRICS? The rising price of oil in USD’s is not the answer. That the price of oil remains expressed in USD’s might be though. So long as there is demand for USD’s to trade oil. Rather than one huge collapse, I see a series of shocks in a continued death from a thousand cuts. It’s going to get worse before it gets worse. For all the market manipulation the Fed has postponed the inevitable until we restore an honest dollar.
Agent P April 12, 2011 at 12:04 am
This is all beginning to come into focus, as many have predicted would be the path – i.e., wash/rinse/repeat. Until of course, the fabric disintegrates into tatters. Of course the Fed knows that public sentiment is awakening – to a degree anyway, perhaps a meaningful one. So their job then becomes one of M.O.P.E. as Jim Sinclair so puts it. Let off the gas and let the car coast for a few months until the market comes screaming back for another dose in August/September. Problem is, these wash/rinse/repeat cycles get shorter and shorter, while creditors see no real meaningful reform taking place. So perhaps it won’t be U.S. that determines our own market/economic destiny this next time around – or will it be a couple more wash/rinse/repeat cycles before doing business in other currencies becomes not inconceivable or even an inconvenience, but an economic Necessity for those other countries to protect themselves? Let’s see if the market begins to price in the June Swoon beforehand, and/or how much difference it will make, for how long. Jim Rickards explained a fairly plausible scenario for the Fed to keep rolling the debt, without necessarily having to ‘announce’ another round of QE. That would be clever – and right line with how things are done, no?
andyinwelling April 12, 2011 at 12:50 am
“How does it play in Bonn?” The government moved back to Berlin in 1999! Well I am English but a language teacher and quite well in tune with continental Europe. In a way the USA matters less and less, the US can’t even defeat the taliban, what is all the point of all that arms spending? I hear it was Russia that sent Japan emergency oil recently. The Chinese have all the money now. Americans, to read comments here and on other sites, seem to be in a little bubble of their own, thinking they are the centre of the universe. Perhaps we just see the US as the home of hypocrisy. You have inflicted, through the IMF, austerity on countries throughout the world but faced with similar problems just create money “out of thin air” and expect others to accept your dodgy I.O.U.s for oil and goods! Your presidents lie to start wars, you preach democracy but support Saudi Arabia, you talk of human rights but turn a blind eye to Israel’s nefarious doings, you ignore its nukes whilst threatening Iran for wanting the same. You talk of freedom and yet people are still locked up in Guantanamo after nearly 10 years, you should try them if you have evidence, and if you won’t try them, you are just helping the Islamic extremists. And if you are the wrong colour the “land of the free” is much more likely to send you to gaol for a stupidly long time and shackle you in a chain gang than if you are white. And decent medical care for everyone is a basic right yet in America some think this is the road to socialism and somehow evil – well in the old East Germany at least the health system was free and no one feared losing their home because of sickness. I could go on but, to sum up the old America we admired seems to have gone: just a few years ago we were being told that Europe was on its way out and the European model was doomed but at least they make things in Germany and France to create real wealth and don’t just manipulate money. Not that Cameron or Sarkozy are any better than US politicians, and yes there are problems a plenty here too.
Brad Thrasher April 12, 2011 at 10:51 am
Quite true andyinwelling. Rather than truly break away from the monarchy we inherited the rotting racist empire your country created. We stepped up to the plate, protected your sorry arse from tyranny and then, unlike your England, or Rome or Greece before us, we rebuilt your’s and their economies and preserved your independence and autonomy. And BTW, you’re welcome.

DavidN April 12, 2011 at 2:07 am





This QE 1,2,3 business is no more likely to work than the Phase I, Phase II, Phase III and Phase IV that Nixon tried. Real economic recovery requires freeing up real resources, not fiat money or gov’t manipulation of the economy.
There are too many wars draining oil and human labor and way too many politicians (poli tics = many blood sucking creatures).

andyinwelling April 12, 2011 at 1:48 pm





Yes I was mystified when in the USA that what we call the “American War of Independence” you call the “American Revolution.” It was no such thing and not at all comparable to the French, Russian or Iranian Revolutions when the capital cities were convulsed and the ruling élites were thrown out: instead your local élite thought they would be better running the show themselves rather than taking orders from far away London. When I saw George Washington’s home at Mount Vernon I realised he was quite the 18th century aristocrat with his estate and grounds. He was also an excellent politician and convinced the lower classes that they should fight for liberty (i.e. the freedom of colonial élite to do as they wished) against the “tyrannical” king George. Meanwhile back in Europe the ruling classes took fright from the French and later Russian revolutions and decided the best way to keep their heads was to go some way to creating a more equal society, though to be honest that is presently under attack in most European countries. What you need is a real revolution (politically, hopefully not a violent one): I hope that if the USA should suffer a real economic crisis a fairer and more democratic America might result with a more modern political system – why not a 2nd Republic and constitution designed for the good of everyone and not just the aristocratic élite- the top dogs in America may not have titles such as duke or marquis but the USA are quite as feudal as any European monarchy such as Holland Belgium or Spain.
Brad Thrasher April 12, 2011 at 9:39 pm
As feudal as any old Euro monarchy you say? LOL. It is good sir, the U.S. Constitution, not the Magna Carta that has been more often modeled and used to advance the cause of human rights from Helsinki to Tianamen Square. And it was the brutality of the US Civil War that scared the beejeebers out of Euro expansionists and marked the sunset on the British Empire. Hubris of any kind amuses me. Fact is America is not in decline, because of America the rest of the world is on the rise.
WorkingClass April 14, 2011 at 2:47 pm
A Second Republic and a new constitution. Yes, this is exactly what is required. But what will a post Imperial USA actually look like? I think it will devolve into regions with varying degrees of autonomy from Washington. Secession and not revolution will follow the collapse.

matador April 12, 2011 at 3:29 pm





Civil rights era call and response:
How long? Not long
How long? Not long

Pal April 12, 2011 at 5:26 pm





wow, being preached to by a Brit. That could sting. Lot’s truths stated by a guy whose country still squanders a billion pounds a year supporting a monarchy and another billion supporting a state church. That does not change the facts and the USA is going to pay dearly very soon. On the other hand maybe the US taxpayer will finally get what they have been screaming for since rebuilding Europe after WWII, a complete stoppage of spending on foreign aid, aka world welfare. Let the Euro Weenies pays for the own protection from Vladimir.
Paul April 15, 2011 at 4:56 am
It ceases to amaze me that anytime someone from Europe dares to criticise America, an American is always at hand to point out that they ‘Bailed’ out Europe during WWII. Oh really. It was 70 years ago. Time to move on I think, it’s sad that that’s the only one of America’s recent military campaign’s that they can actually day they’ve helped win. Doubly amazing considering the UK is of the largest holders of US debt. And ‘Brit’, Really? I assume you and all your countrymen like being called ‘Yanks’ all the time? Foreign Aid? Would that be the same foreign aid that you’re happy to pay Israel on an annual basis? I wonder if Tel Aviv is aware it’s on ‘Welfare’? Also, Regarding ‘Vladimir’? Another, rather blatantly, Red Neck statment about a Russian I assume? It’s 2011 ‘Pal’, not 1911. Read a paper and turn off your TV, Sir.

Bruce C. April 12, 2011 at 7:52 pm





“The people who are running this show” may be incompetent or may be nefarious or may be both or may be neither. It really seems impossible to say, even using circumstantial and anecdotal evidence. I say this because, as I think most readers would agree, the current fiat money, centrally controlled, and fractional reserve banking system is inherently flawed and unsustainable. If that is true then no matter what policies are invoked, and for whatever reasons, the system is destined to disintegrate anyway. Furthermore, I presume that it’s possible to extend the system for longer than it otherwise might through certain policies over others, and if that’s true then I would have to say that those in control are actually doing a pretty good job. Most fiat money systems devolve to zero within about 90 years and yet the US money system has lasted for about 98 years and counting, depending upon the chosen start date (I’m assuming it began with the Fed bank in 1913.) I’m not saying that it’s not rigged and corrupt and immoral, I’m just saying that “the seeds to their own destruction” are already baked in and are not necessarily because of incompetence or willful destruction, though those may be additional factors that compound the complexities.
At this point, or arguably since 2000, there are no good options for the Fed and all the rest of the central banks. Every action now has equally negative reactions. The re-inflation of asset prices increases costs to consumers and businesses which crimps economic activity and thus tends to deflate asset prices because of lower demand and corporate profits. Furthermore, when the cycle completes itself asset prices are again the same or lower as before but there is much more total debt as well, hence the steady increase in precious metal prices which are a proxy for global debt levels.
This process can no longer be stopped, if it ever could, no matter what the Fed or the Treasury or the Congress does or doesn’t do. Its demise can at best only be slowed down or postponed. Personally, I’m very interested in how QE 2 is handled in the next few months, along with the spin about precious metals prices. Treasuries may well sell better than one might think because of a lack of options. Maybe the US will assume Japan’s traditional role of “lender at the lowest rates” in the carry trade.
Brad Thrasher April 12, 2011 at 9:48 pm
Yes Bruce C., in words for the rest of us, Schumpeter’s creative destruction model has been on steroids since Greenspan, no?

Stock Trading Course Teacher April 13, 2011 at 12:17 am





The guys at Casey Research addressed this very scenario at http://www.caseyresearch.com/cwc/casey-report-s-david-galland-major-policy-shift-ahead
The premise is as you suggest – Fed tightening will force treasury rates (& thus the dollar) up, resulting in a drop in commodities & pm’s. Side effects could include a market crash and, if the “pain” becomes politically unbearable a resumption of QE or QE style policies.
Opportunities for investors and traders who identify this as the pattern playing out would be significant.
Bruce C. April 13, 2011 at 11:25 am
I know that’s Galland’s prediction, and he’s not alone, but as of last night on the Kudlow report, word from the Fed is that they intend to maintain “an easy money policy for the forseeable future.” They all cheered that decision. Maybe the Fed just wants to keep the balls in the air for as long as possible based upon expectations, but if they/Goldman is right about the recent rise in commodity prices being short lived due to speculation then they’ll have the cover they’ll need to keep priming.

Brad Thrasher April 13, 2011 at 12:39 pm





My own near term forecast is that the Fed is taking its cue from the fiscal policy debate in Congress. A budget will determine how and when the Fed can adjust QE.
Bruce C. April 13, 2011 at 4:34 pm
How so?
Brad Thrasher April 13, 2011 at 11:30 pm
Really Bruce, or is this a test? The current fiscal policy debate is centered around a combination of spending cuts (advocated by the Republicans) and revenue increases (advocated by the Democrats.) There is absolutely no disagreement, despite the rhetoric, that the USG MUST get closer to a balanced budget. Regardless of how it is done, spending cuts AND tax increases, the result is deficit reduction which also reduces the supply of new Treasuries to market. Hopefully, there is enough increase in consumer and corporate capital spending to pick up the slack and grow the economy. Wondering aloud, will they recognize a properly stated Keynesian view when they see it :)
Bruce C. April 14, 2011 at 12:41 am
Okay, so if there is “absolutely no disagreement” that the deficit must decrease, are you saying that the Fed will continue QE (2) until that actually happens? Or, do you mean that the Fed will end QE in June and then continue it iff the pols can’t manage to decrease the borrowing in the near future? Your original statement was “A budget will determine how and when the Fed can adjust QE.” But that could be months/years(?) away. The Fed has to deal with the expectations of a stoppage in June first. The debt ceiling issue in May is going to be wild (can you imagine them having to set it at $15.9 T just for one more year!) and I highly doubt any sort of budget will be set then. Please, don’t hold your breath until a new budget is ratified. We’ll all miss you.
Brad Thrasher April 14, 2011 at 12:26 pm
True Bruce, a budget, not some artificial June deadline will dictate when and by how much QE2 is adjusted. The phrase “Qualitative Easing” is what happens when Wall Street goes to Madison Avenue. They may have to re-brand QE or drop the phrase all together. As for actually changing the policy, I think not. The Fed has already made an all in bet. Its chips are in the pot. The Fed may or may not lose the hand (QE) but one hand doesn’t change the game. They’ll make as many more chips as necessary.

Para April 15, 2011 at 7:53 pm





Paul,
I do not think the families of the dead from WWI or WWII or the Cold War, all of whom kept Western Europe from a dictator of one sort or another, would agree it is “Time to move on”.
Andy, you couldn’t be more wrong about so much. Are you even aware of how many Arabs surround Isreal and how many Isrealis they have killed? I would never restrain myself the way the Isrealis have. Oh yes, those poor Arabs that live within occupied areas…Ask them if they want to return to te middle ages in their neighboring Arab states from which they came. And Gitmo? Okay, no sweat, lets put all of those nice middle eastern men in your neighborhood. You boys can hold hands and sing “Kum-Bah-Yah” together, while you discuss the finer points of that great religion of peace, islam. You are right about one thing, we have not defeated Al-quaida. That is because we are too nice to them. We should have already killed all known Al-quaida. But you see, we are not imperialists as you have been, and we have learned the lesssons from your colonial endeavors, that brutalizing a nation does not make for long term peace. So yes, it is messy work, similar to your experience in Malaysia, in which your SAS did a superb job I may add, but it took lots of time. Read, “War of the Running Dogs” for how to wage such a campaign. You Brits did great job there, seiously. You say that you (Europe), respected us more in the past, yet then we had basically no social welfare, a strong economy, a weaker central government, and a better sense of when to get involved in the world. Now our incompetent social welfare system has brought us to a point where many, if not most, feel like they are entitled and live off those of us who work. Our dollar is destroyed supporting all of that aforementioned welfare, and you Europeans have not had to cough up your real share of money for defense since WWII or perhaps even before. Folks like to talk about how much we owe the UN. I would like to know how much Europe has saved while the US military has protected them, allowing them to divert tons of money into social programs that are ineffectively managed in most cases? I was at a dinner one night, and our guest speaker, a very nice English chap, fell over. He was rushed to a hospital, his heart attack stopped, and a pacemaker inserted. Back in Jolly ‘ole England, he had been told he was not eligible for a pacemaker, though they knew he needed one. He was too old. He was only 62…They kept giving him pills to pop, as they are cheaper. Don’t worry though, soon we will adopt fully your “enlightened” system, where government decides who lives and who dies. There are many examples of the failures of British socialism, how you have sustained rolling power blackouts at times beginning in the 1970s, not due to shortages, but cost. How your government could not afford to bring your war dead home after WWII, as ours did for all families that chose such, and how your government asked ours to keep this quiet, so as not to cause a revolt in Britain. How we kept sending food, especially meat, to England for free even into the 1950s as your government could not afford it. How we sent privately owned firearms,(seperate from Lend-Lease, these were sent from citizens), thousand of them,to England to keep you free as you faced invasion…etc., etc… We send more food aid, more medical aid, more doctors, more money, we help more than any nation during any time of need anywhere in the world. And we should. But now it is time for us to pull back, let you Europeans deal with the continued after-effects of your rape and pillage of the poorer nations, excuse me, colonization, yourselves…As for George Washington, you know nothing. He was offered a kingship, and denied it so that we Americans could be free. I don’t expect you to understand, but we have been allowed to have lots of property and wealth here, as we refuse to bow to a king or queen, and be servile as the serfs of Europe have been and are. Your comments about black Americans are hilarious. We fail to have any truthful conversation in this country about race, due the politcially correct nature of things here, just like in Europe, but in America Andy, blacks really do commit a majority of crime. They are slaves within a social welfare system that robs them of their pride and ability to achieve. They have been old out by their so-calle “leaders”, who take millions to run around our nation and rabble rouse. I know of no nation, and I have been to several, that protects minority rights like ours does. I know of no real racists, except for plenty of black people who have been taught to hate white people, believing the same marxist drivel that you have parroted. A former President, Lyndon Johnson, summed up why the Democrats in this country switched from being the party of racists, to supposedly embracing blacks…He said, “If we vote for this bill (what would become the Civil Rights Act, a bill that Republicans tried to pass in the 1950s), them niggers will be voting for us for the next 200 years!”. And so it is, hooked on welfare, as are many whites now sadly to say. I really like you Brits, Andy, and would love to share a pint and have a friendly debate about the merits of freedom vs socialism, but it likely won’t happen due to our distance. Have a great weekend, and open your mind to the possibilities of what would happen if you and other Britishers demanded real freedom…We have almost lost ours here, but I believe we will take it back. America may be guilty of being naive, and true, we have many of the issues that writers here describe, but we are still basically a good nation, one I am proud of. As the people awake, get involved again in their politics, watch us overthrow the Soros’ of the world, and the other globalists. You can all have your one-world government, but we my friend, are waking up.
Andyinwelling April 15, 2011 at 10:37 pm
Firstly let me point out that I did not mean to offend but to challenge, I think the failing American political system is responsible for most of the economic problems we all face: sometimes I think Americans are victims of your own propaganda, for example the near religious idolatry you have for that piece of paper called the US constitution. It is often regarded, so it seems to me as an outsider, as a sort of Third Testament of Holy Writ, and it is mentioned in debate in exactly the same way as a preacher uses the Bible, when preaching to the converted. The ideals behind your constutution are fine, noble and praiseworthy, but when I observe the dreadful state of politics in the USA at present, (I was appalled when I had the privilege of attending a “debate” in the US Senate in 2009 by the low intellectual level of the discussions) I think you need to have a rational look at the way things really are and renew the system in a way that respects both the ideals of your founders and present day realities, not those of the late 18th century. The French are now on their 5th Republican Constutution since 1789, each new one born from often painful events such as the defeat in 1940, they have remained true to the ideals of 1789 whilst renewing the political system. Yet the very thought of writing a new constitution would be dismissed as heresy in the USA and few think you have anything to learn from the French. Of course there are many things wrong in European politics too: Sarko is quite the worst president of France I can remember – I lived in France at one point – and I would try Tony Blair as a war criminal if I had any say in the matter and the less said about Libya the better. As for Islam, I have real doubts about that, but then my Moslem neighbours are just ordinary people like me, and when I go to moslem countries the natives want to sell me things not slit my throat. We can best resist islamic extremism by sticking firmly to our moral values rather than bombing islamic countries. Perhaps many Americans do not know any moslems at a personal level? It is harder to hate Moslems when I chat with Ali at the local take away kebab shop, about Ramadan or the news, as he prepares my doner and chips, and I agree with him that Turkey was a wonderful place for a holiday. As for power cuts in the 1970s I remember them: they were caused by the conflict between the Conservative government and the unions not by any failure of socialism ….. They were a nuisance but no one starved. As for the Russians, they spend lots in the shops in Central London, they have plenty of oil, gold, and natural gas and most Europeans are not afraid of them at all, we just want to do business. As for World War II, if I, at the age of 51, see no reason to be eternally grateful for something that happened before my birth, you can guess that the younger generation have even less reason to feel gratitude for what the US did back then. In any case, whilst Britain and France went to war in September 1939 to help Poland, you only entered the war in December 1941 after you were attacked, your industrialists made a fortune selling us stuff on loans we only paid off 50 years later and the Russians made a huge contribution to defeating the Nazis. Eastern Europe was rebuild by the communists without a cent of American money so I fail to understand why the citizens of Leipzig, Prague or Budapest need to feel any moral debt to you. Finally I think the UK will suffer greatly from any crisis in the American economic system as the USA will be (rightly) concerned with itself. This should create some wry satisfaction in Paris, Berlin and Moscow…..

Bruce C. April 16, 2011 at 2:09 am





Against my better judgment, I’d like to comment on a few of the comments from several commenters here.
First of all, there needs to be a distinction recognized between the scope and actions of the US Federal government and the principles of the US Constitution. Similarly, there is a difference between the “soul” of the federal government and the soul of its citizenry. I can understand or imagine how any foreigner can conclude that the the official political face of a country’s government accurately represents the desires and intents of its citizenry, but that is not always the case, as you may attest for your own. From my vantage point I would say that any one living in the US who is paying any attention to politics and governmental actions and policies feels betrayed and alienated and scared. The US Federal government has become a monster that bullies and threatens everyone far and wide. US citizens are doing the best they can, having been double-crossed – arguably for their own lack of education, vigilance, and “devil’s bargains”, but also for their perhaps naive trust in government itself. In any case, feeding the fires of insanity and hypocrisy and all the rest of the negative comparisons dooms everyone. Do you really think it an exaggeration that if America falls humanity is doomed? There is no “new world” to escape to. There are no “new ideas” that will be able to spread, never mind take root. The philosophical foundations of a greater state of humanity and life on earth are in danger of being expunged. The actions of the US government – or any national government – are not the will of most people, so stop conflating the two.

Brad Thrasher April 16, 2011 at 11:15 am





Another anecdote on our time:
04/16/2011 Dateline San Bernardino, Ca. Yesterday evening Retired Hockey Mom, my bride of 27 consecutive years and I drove smack dab into what we assumed was a sobriety check point this evening. This was no sobriety check point. This was asset seizure. We witnessed no sobriety. Merely a sign directing all to have license, registration and proof of insurance ready for inspection. Those who lacked the proper paper work had their cars impounded.
A few blocks ahead, we passed a rather well dressed hitchhiker.
Moral? There are no cops, just revenue agents.

andyinwelling April 16, 2011 at 3:32 pm





Have any of you any thoughts about the latest (15/4/11) prediction by leap 2020? They haven’t yet translated it from French into English or other languages but they are predicting the following by the autumn of 2011.
1) The USA will be forced into savage austerity
2) The market in US treasuries will collapse (they predicted this last month)
3) The US dollar will devalue by about 30% in a matter of weeks (after perhaps growing stronger one last time first.)
They see all these things as interconnected and feeding on each other. They are scathing about the UK government too and see the UK as being very vulnerable. (I agree with that)
Now of course they are being very French and having a go at “les Anglo-Saxons” but they
did say late last year that 2011 would be “l’annee impitoyable” – a “merciless year” of troubles and upsets, and predicted the coming economic crash as long ago as 2006 so they cannot be dismissed as total idiots.
As for the difference between the US goverment and the American people, that is obviously the case ,and perhaps as all this drama plays out they will summon up the courage to take back power from the oligarchs, bankers and corrupt politicians and demand real deomocracy.

No comments: